For those interested in the world of rock ‘n roll, a new guitar has been made by Gibson. It is called the Les Paul Appetite, after the Guns ‘n Roses album “Appetite For Destruction” as it a replica of the guitar Slash used on the album.
The most interesting thing about the new guitar is that it is made by Gibson, because the original was not. It was a copy of Gibson Les Paul; a very expensive guitar (the new Appetite model is £2,000) Many young (and old) musicians can’t afford one, but want the vibe. Slash’s original guitar had a fake Gibson logo; it was supposed to look like a Gibson guitar.
As well as being expensive, Gibson guitars are (along with Fender) probably the most famous brand in rock music. If you have the original Guitar Hero game – the guitar in it is a Gibson Les Paul lookalike.
So which is the real brand: the name Gibson, or the shape, feel and sound of the guitar? It may well be the latter, but thousands of old rockers, Slash wannabees and Gibson-lovers will fork out £2000 for this because it’s a Gibson.
Are they missing the point? Does it matter?